How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Togo?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Serbia vs Togo: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Serbia

20.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Togo

18.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Serbia rank

35th

Togo rank

36th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

Serbia
Togo

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 20.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 18.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Togo, a difference of 1.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Serbia ranks 35th and Togo ranks 36th of 165 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 2 and Togo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Serbia	Togo	Difference	Ahead
2000s	10.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre	4.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre	6.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre	Serbia
2010s	10.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre	9.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre	1.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre	Serbia
2020s	18.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre	18.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre	852,050 constant LCU per square kilometre	Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Serbia or Togo?: Serbia, at 20.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 18.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Togo as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Serbia and Togo?: 1.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Togo?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Serbia and Togo rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?: Serbia ranks 35th and Togo ranks 36th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Togo: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/serbia/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/serbia/togo/">Serbia vs Togo: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit: constant LCU per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.