How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Turkey?

34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Romania vs Turkey: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Romania

718,937 constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Turkey

753,326 constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Romania rank

100th

Turkey rank

99th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

Romania
Turkey

How they compare

Turkey currently reports 753,326 constant LCU per square kilometre against 718,937 constant LCU per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 34,389 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.

Romania ranks 100th and Turkey ranks 99th of 165 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 2 and Turkey in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Romania	Turkey	Difference	Ahead
1990s	158,495 constant LCU per square kilometre	152,020 constant LCU per square kilometre	6,475 constant LCU per square kilometre	Romania
2000s	340,726 constant LCU per square kilometre	270,470 constant LCU per square kilometre	70,255 constant LCU per square kilometre	Romania
2010s	488,781 constant LCU per square kilometre	548,050 constant LCU per square kilometre	59,269 constant LCU per square kilometre	Turkey
2020s	637,479 constant LCU per square kilometre	688,621 constant LCU per square kilometre	51,142 constant LCU per square kilometre	Turkey

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Romania or Turkey?: Turkey, at 753,326 constant LCU per square kilometre against 718,937 constant LCU per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Romania and Turkey?: 34,389 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Turkey ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Turkey?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Romania and Turkey rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?: Romania ranks 100th and Turkey ranks 99th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs Turkey: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/romania/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/romania/turkiye/">Romania vs Turkey: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit: constant LCU per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.