Papua New Guinea vs Tajikistan: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Papua New Guinea
3,782 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2004
Tajikistan
2,000 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2013
Papua New Guinea rank
162nd
Tajikistan rank
163rd

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Tajikistan
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119872013

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 3,782 constant LCU per square kilometre against 2,000 constant LCU per square kilometre in Tajikistan, a difference of 1,782 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.9 times Tajikistan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Tajikistan ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 162nd and Tajikistan ranks 163rd of 165 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s 2,814 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,925 constant LCU per square kilometre 111.59 constant LCU per square kilometre Tajikistan
2000s 3,948 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,141 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,807 constant LCU per square kilometre Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Papua New Guinea or Tajikistan?
Papua New Guinea, at 3,782 constant LCU per square kilometre against 2,000 constant LCU per square kilometre in Tajikistan as of 2004.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Papua New Guinea and Tajikistan?
1,782 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Tajikistan?
12 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2004.
How do Papua New Guinea and Tajikistan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Papua New Guinea ranks 162nd and Tajikistan ranks 163rd of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Tajikistan: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/tajikistan/">Papua New Guinea vs Tajikistan: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.