Panama vs Tonga: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Panama
337,719 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tonga
372,468 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
117th
Tonga rank
116th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Panama
  • Tonga
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199420082023

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 372,468 constant LCU per square kilometre against 337,719 constant LCU per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 34,749 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Tonga's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Tonga ahead.

Panama ranks 117th and Tonga ranks 116th of 165 countries.

Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Tonga Difference Ahead
1990s 50,356 constant LCU per square kilometre 225,686 constant LCU per square kilometre 175,330 constant LCU per square kilometre Tonga
2000s 79,123 constant LCU per square kilometre 218,278 constant LCU per square kilometre 139,154 constant LCU per square kilometre Tonga
2010s 280,948 constant LCU per square kilometre 291,275 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,327 constant LCU per square kilometre Tonga
2020s 260,352 constant LCU per square kilometre 359,700 constant LCU per square kilometre 99,348 constant LCU per square kilometre Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Panama or Tonga?
Tonga, at 372,468 constant LCU per square kilometre against 337,719 constant LCU per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Panama and Tonga?
34,749 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Tonga?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Panama and Tonga rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Panama ranks 117th and Tonga ranks 116th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Tonga: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/panama/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/panama/tonga/">Panama vs Tonga: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.