Oman vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Oman
27,802 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
16,897 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman rank
156th
Zimbabwe rank
159th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Oman
  • Zimbabwe
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199820102023

How they compare

Oman currently reports 27,802 constant LCU per square kilometre against 16,897 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 10,905 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Oman's figure about 1.6 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.

Oman ranks 156th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 165 countries.

Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 25,380 constant LCU per square kilometre 6,239 constant LCU per square kilometre 19,141 constant LCU per square kilometre Oman
2010s 30,358 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,217 constant LCU per square kilometre 18,140 constant LCU per square kilometre Oman
2020s 28,311 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,623 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,688 constant LCU per square kilometre Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Oman or Zimbabwe?
Oman, at 27,802 constant LCU per square kilometre against 16,897 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Oman and Zimbabwe?
10,905 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Zimbabwe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Oman and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Oman ranks 156th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oman vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/oman/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/oman/zimbabwe/">Oman vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.