Oman vs East Timor: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Oman
27,802 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
22,782 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman rank
156th
East Timor rank
158th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Oman
  • East Timor
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199820102023

How they compare

Oman currently reports 27,802 constant LCU per square kilometre against 22,782 constant LCU per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 5,020 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Oman's figure about 1.2 times East Timor's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was East Timor ahead.

Oman ranks 156th and East Timor ranks 158th of 165 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 14,766 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,839 constant LCU per square kilometre 927.28 constant LCU per square kilometre Oman
2010s 30,358 constant LCU per square kilometre 39,817 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,459 constant LCU per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 28,311 constant LCU per square kilometre 24,063 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,248 constant LCU per square kilometre Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Oman or East Timor?
Oman, at 27,802 constant LCU per square kilometre against 22,782 constant LCU per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Oman and East Timor?
5,020 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and East Timor?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Oman and East Timor rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Oman ranks 156th and East Timor ranks 158th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oman vs East Timor: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/oman/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/oman/timor-leste/">Oman vs East Timor: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.