Norway vs Sweden: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Norway
2.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
70th
Sweden rank
68th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Norway
  • Sweden
1.0M2.0M3.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 2.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 404,880 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sweden ahead.

Norway ranks 70th and Sweden ranks 68th of 165 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 938,050 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre 238,134 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 1.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre 249,387 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 1.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre 320,890 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 1.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre 266,060 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 2.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre 180,591 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 2.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre 336,432 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Norway or Sweden?
Sweden, at 3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 2.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Norway and Sweden?
404,880 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Sweden?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Norway and Sweden rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Norway ranks 70th and Sweden ranks 68th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Sweden: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/norway/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/norway/sweden/">Norway vs Sweden: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.