Nicaragua vs Portugal: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Nicaragua
418,419 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
505,231 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua rank
115th
Portugal rank
112th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Portugal
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 505,231 constant LCU per square kilometre against 418,419 constant LCU per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 86,812 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.2 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Portugal ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 115th and Portugal ranks 112th of 165 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Portugal Difference Ahead
1970s 156,822 constant LCU per square kilometre 203,226 constant LCU per square kilometre 46,404 constant LCU per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 163,044 constant LCU per square kilometre 244,274 constant LCU per square kilometre 81,231 constant LCU per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 148,943 constant LCU per square kilometre 383,757 constant LCU per square kilometre 234,814 constant LCU per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 231,780 constant LCU per square kilometre 497,140 constant LCU per square kilometre 265,360 constant LCU per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 361,580 constant LCU per square kilometre 375,473 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,893 constant LCU per square kilometre Portugal
2020s 365,151 constant LCU per square kilometre 467,710 constant LCU per square kilometre 102,558 constant LCU per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Nicaragua or Portugal?
Portugal, at 505,231 constant LCU per square kilometre against 418,419 constant LCU per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Nicaragua and Portugal?
86,812 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Portugal?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Nicaragua and Portugal rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Nicaragua ranks 115th and Portugal ranks 112th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Portugal: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/portugal/">Nicaragua vs Portugal: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.