Nicaragua vs Panama: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Nicaragua
418,419 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
337,719 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua rank
115th
Panama rank
117th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Panama
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 418,419 constant LCU per square kilometre against 337,719 constant LCU per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 80,700 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.2 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 115th and Panama ranks 117th of 165 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 192,577 constant LCU per square kilometre 50,356 constant LCU per square kilometre 142,221 constant LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 231,780 constant LCU per square kilometre 79,123 constant LCU per square kilometre 152,657 constant LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 361,580 constant LCU per square kilometre 280,948 constant LCU per square kilometre 80,632 constant LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 365,151 constant LCU per square kilometre 260,352 constant LCU per square kilometre 104,799 constant LCU per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Nicaragua or Panama?
Nicaragua, at 418,419 constant LCU per square kilometre against 337,719 constant LCU per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Nicaragua and Panama?
80,700 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Panama?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Nicaragua and Panama rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Nicaragua ranks 115th and Panama ranks 117th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Panama: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/panama/">Nicaragua vs Panama: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.