New Zealand vs Panama: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

New Zealand
325,671 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
337,719 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
118th
Panama rank
117th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • New Zealand
  • Panama
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k197019962023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 337,719 constant LCU per square kilometre against 325,671 constant LCU per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 12,048 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 118th and Panama ranks 117th of 165 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Panama in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 120,784 constant LCU per square kilometre 50,356 constant LCU per square kilometre 70,428 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 174,999 constant LCU per square kilometre 79,123 constant LCU per square kilometre 95,875 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 240,657 constant LCU per square kilometre 280,948 constant LCU per square kilometre 40,291 constant LCU per square kilometre Panama
2020s 316,056 constant LCU per square kilometre 260,352 constant LCU per square kilometre 55,704 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, New Zealand or Panama?
Panama, at 337,719 constant LCU per square kilometre against 325,671 constant LCU per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between New Zealand and Panama?
12,048 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Panama?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Panama rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
New Zealand ranks 118th and Panama ranks 117th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Panama: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/panama/">New Zealand vs Panama: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.