How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Zimbabwe?

14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Libya vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Libya

5,775 constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

16,897 constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Libya rank

161st

Zimbabwe rank

159th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

Libya
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 16,897 constant LCU per square kilometre against 5,775 constant LCU per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 11,122 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.9 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 165 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Libya	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2010s	8,329 constant LCU per square kilometre	12,217 constant LCU per square kilometre	3,888 constant LCU per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2020s	6,455 constant LCU per square kilometre	13,623 constant LCU per square kilometre	7,169 constant LCU per square kilometre	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Libya or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 16,897 constant LCU per square kilometre against 5,775 constant LCU per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Libya and Zimbabwe?: 11,122 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Zimbabwe?: 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Libya and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?: Libya ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/libya/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/libya/zimbabwe/">Libya vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit: constant LCU per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.