Latvia vs Sierra Leone: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Latvia
121,606 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sierra Leone
143,035 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
135th
Sierra Leone rank
134th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Latvia
  • Sierra Leone
0100.0k200.0k300.0k198020012023

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 143,035 constant LCU per square kilometre against 121,606 constant LCU per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 21,429 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 135th and Sierra Leone ranks 134th of 165 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Sierra Leone in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1990s 35,617 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,196 constant LCU per square kilometre 23,422 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 99,547 constant LCU per square kilometre 40,097 constant LCU per square kilometre 59,450 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 96,649 constant LCU per square kilometre 156,506 constant LCU per square kilometre 59,857 constant LCU per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2020s 115,270 constant LCU per square kilometre 118,702 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,432 constant LCU per square kilometre Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Latvia or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 143,035 constant LCU per square kilometre against 121,606 constant LCU per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Latvia and Sierra Leone?
21,429 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sierra Leone?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Sierra Leone rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Latvia ranks 135th and Sierra Leone ranks 134th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Sierra Leone: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/sierra-leone/">Latvia vs Sierra Leone: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.