How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tunisia?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Kiribati vs Tunisia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Kiribati

118,825 constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Tunisia

106,623 constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Kiribati rank

137th

Tunisia rank

139th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

Kiribati
Tunisia

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 118,825 constant LCU per square kilometre against 106,623 constant LCU per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 12,202 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Tunisia ahead.

Kiribati ranks 137th and Tunisia ranks 139th of 165 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Kiribati	Tunisia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	35,905 constant LCU per square kilometre	89,598 constant LCU per square kilometre	53,693 constant LCU per square kilometre	Tunisia
2010s	74,893 constant LCU per square kilometre	124,201 constant LCU per square kilometre	49,308 constant LCU per square kilometre	Tunisia
2020s	84,163 constant LCU per square kilometre	102,972 constant LCU per square kilometre	18,809 constant LCU per square kilometre	Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Kiribati or Tunisia?: Kiribati, at 118,825 constant LCU per square kilometre against 106,623 constant LCU per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Kiribati and Tunisia?: 12,202 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tunisia?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Tunisia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?: Kiribati ranks 137th and Tunisia ranks 139th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Tunisia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/tunisia/">Kiribati vs Tunisia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit: constant LCU per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.