Kiribati vs Sierra Leone: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Kiribati
118,825 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sierra Leone
143,035 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
137th
Sierra Leone rank
134th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Kiribati
  • Sierra Leone
0100.0k200.0k300.0k198020012023

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 143,035 constant LCU per square kilometre against 118,825 constant LCU per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 24,210 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Kiribati ranks 137th and Sierra Leone ranks 134th of 165 countries.

Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
2000s 35,905 constant LCU per square kilometre 49,734 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,829 constant LCU per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2010s 74,893 constant LCU per square kilometre 156,506 constant LCU per square kilometre 81,613 constant LCU per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2020s 84,163 constant LCU per square kilometre 118,702 constant LCU per square kilometre 34,539 constant LCU per square kilometre Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Kiribati or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 143,035 constant LCU per square kilometre against 118,825 constant LCU per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Kiribati and Sierra Leone?
24,210 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Sierra Leone?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Sierra Leone rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Kiribati ranks 137th and Sierra Leone ranks 134th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Sierra Leone: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/sierra-leone/">Kiribati vs Sierra Leone: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.