Kiribati vs Peru: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Kiribati
118,825 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
100,717 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
137th
Peru rank
140th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Kiribati
  • Peru
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 118,825 constant LCU per square kilometre against 100,717 constant LCU per square kilometre in Peru, a difference of 18,108 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.2 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Peru ahead.

Kiribati ranks 137th and Peru ranks 140th of 165 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Peru Difference Ahead
2000s 35,905 constant LCU per square kilometre 54,009 constant LCU per square kilometre 18,104 constant LCU per square kilometre Peru
2010s 74,893 constant LCU per square kilometre 90,327 constant LCU per square kilometre 15,434 constant LCU per square kilometre Peru
2020s 84,163 constant LCU per square kilometre 98,138 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,975 constant LCU per square kilometre Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Kiribati or Peru?
Kiribati, at 118,825 constant LCU per square kilometre against 100,717 constant LCU per square kilometre in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Kiribati and Peru?
18,108 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Peru?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Peru rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Kiribati ranks 137th and Peru ranks 140th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Peru: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/peru/">Kiribati vs Peru: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.