Kiribati vs Latvia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Kiribati
118,825 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
121,606 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
137th
Latvia rank
135th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Kiribati
  • Latvia
050.0k100.0k150.0k199520092023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 121,606 constant LCU per square kilometre against 118,825 constant LCU per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 2,781 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Latvia ahead.

Kiribati ranks 137th and Latvia ranks 135th of 165 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 35,905 constant LCU per square kilometre 131,540 constant LCU per square kilometre 95,635 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 74,893 constant LCU per square kilometre 96,649 constant LCU per square kilometre 21,756 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 84,163 constant LCU per square kilometre 115,270 constant LCU per square kilometre 31,106 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Kiribati or Latvia?
Latvia, at 121,606 constant LCU per square kilometre against 118,825 constant LCU per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Kiribati and Latvia?
2,781 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Latvia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Latvia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Kiribati ranks 137th and Latvia ranks 135th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Latvia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/latvia/">Kiribati vs Latvia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.