Kenya vs Sweden: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Kenya
3.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya rank
67th
Sweden rank
68th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Kenya
  • Sweden
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922023

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 3.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 31,390 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Sweden ahead.

Kenya ranks 67th and Sweden ranks 68th of 165 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 516,045 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre 650,985 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 438,625 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre 949,688 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 559,010 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre 963,122 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 1.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 2.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre 170,910 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 3.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre 22,655 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Kenya or Sweden?
Kenya, at 3.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Kenya and Sweden?
31,390 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Sweden?
45 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2023.
How do Kenya and Sweden rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Kenya ranks 67th and Sweden ranks 68th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Sweden: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kenya/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kenya/sweden/">Kenya vs Sweden: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.