Kenya vs Norway: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Kenya
3.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
2.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya rank
67th
Norway rank
70th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Kenya
  • Norway
01.0M2.0M3.0M197019962023

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 3.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 2.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 436,270 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Kenya's figure about 1.2 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Norway ahead.

Kenya ranks 67th and Norway ranks 70th of 165 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 516,045 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre 523,765 constant LCU per square kilometre Norway
1980s 438,625 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre 700,301 constant LCU per square kilometre Norway
1990s 559,010 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre 642,232 constant LCU per square kilometre Norway
2000s 1.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre 755,092 constant LCU per square kilometre Norway
2010s 2.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9,681 constant LCU per square kilometre Kenya
2020s 3.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre 313,778 constant LCU per square kilometre Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Kenya or Norway?
Kenya, at 3.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 2.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Kenya and Norway?
436,270 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Norway?
45 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2023.
How do Kenya and Norway rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Kenya ranks 67th and Norway ranks 70th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Norway: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kenya/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kenya/norway/">Kenya vs Norway: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.