Kenya vs Mexico: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Kenya
3.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
3.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya rank
67th
Mexico rank
69th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Kenya
  • Mexico
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922023

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 3.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 3.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 196,740 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 45 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Mexico ahead.

Kenya ranks 67th and Mexico ranks 69th of 165 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Mexico Difference Ahead
1970s 516,045 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre 775,215 constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 438,625 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre 818,822 constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 559,010 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 1.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 2.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre 288,319 constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 3.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre 519,285 constant LCU per square kilometre Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Kenya or Mexico?
Kenya, at 3.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 3.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Kenya and Mexico?
196,740 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Mexico?
45 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2023.
How do Kenya and Mexico rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Kenya ranks 67th and Mexico ranks 69th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Mexico: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kenya/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kenya/mexico/">Kenya vs Mexico: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.