Japan vs Rwanda: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Japan
426.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
248.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan rank
7th
Rwanda rank
9th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Japan
  • Rwanda
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M500.0M196519942023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 426.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 248.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 177.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.7 times Rwanda's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Japan ranks 7th and Rwanda ranks 9th of 165 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 225.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre 220.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre Japan
1980s 314.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre 13.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre 301.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre Japan
1990s 441.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre 430.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre Japan
2000s 405.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre 32.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre 372.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre Japan
2010s 391.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre 104.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre 287.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre Japan
2020s 418.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre 197.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre 221.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Japan or Rwanda?
Japan, at 426.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 248.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Japan and Rwanda?
177.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Rwanda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Japan and Rwanda rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Japan ranks 7th and Rwanda ranks 9th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Rwanda: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/japan/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/japan/rwanda/">Japan vs Rwanda: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.