Israel vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Israel
18.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
20.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel rank
38th
Serbia rank
35th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Israel
  • Serbia
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196119922023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 20.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 18.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 1.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Israel ranks 38th and Serbia ranks 35th of 165 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 9.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 12.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.77 million constant LCU per square kilometre Israel
2020s 17.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre 18.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre 661,375 constant LCU per square kilometre Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Israel or Serbia?
Serbia, at 20.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 18.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Israel and Serbia?
1.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Israel and Serbia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Israel ranks 38th and Serbia ranks 35th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/israel/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/israel/serbia/">Israel vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.