Iceland vs Malta: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Iceland
8.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
10.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
49th
Malta rank
47th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • Malta
2.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M197019962023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 10.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 8.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 2.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 49th and Malta ranks 47th of 165 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 5.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 5.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre Malta
2020s 7.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Iceland or Malta?
Malta, at 10.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 8.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Iceland and Malta?
2.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malta?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Malta rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Iceland ranks 49th and Malta ranks 47th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Malta: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iceland/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iceland/malta/">Iceland vs Malta: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.