How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Laos?

17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hungary vs Laos: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Hungary

139.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Laos

149.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2016

Hungary rank

16th

Laos rank

15th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

Hungary
Laos

How they compare

Laos currently reports 149.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 139.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 10.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Laos's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 16th and Laos ranks 15th of 165 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Laos in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Hungary	Laos	Difference	Ahead
2000s	96.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre	53.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre	42.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre	Hungary
2010s	94.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre	116.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre	21.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre	Laos

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Hungary or Laos?: Laos, at 149.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 139.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2016.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Hungary and Laos?: 10.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Laos ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Laos?: 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
How do Hungary and Laos rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?: Hungary ranks 16th and Laos ranks 15th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Laos: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/hungary/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/hungary/lao-pdr/">Hungary vs Laos: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit: constant LCU per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.