Hong Kong vs Rwanda: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Hong Kong
481.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
248.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
6th
Rwanda rank
9th
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time
- Hong Kong
- Rwanda
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 481.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 248.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 232.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.9 times Rwanda's.
Across all 59 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 6th and Rwanda ranks 9th of 165 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 47.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 45.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre | Hong Kong |
| 1970s | 81.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 5.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 76.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | Hong Kong |
| 1980s | 183.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 13.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 170.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre | Hong Kong |
| 1990s | 341.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 330.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 403.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 32.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 370.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 535.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 104.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 431.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 452.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 197.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 255.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Hong Kong or Rwanda?
- Hong Kong, at 481.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 248.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Hong Kong and Rwanda?
- 232.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Rwanda?
- 59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong and Rwanda rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Hong Kong ranks 6th and Rwanda ranks 9th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.