How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Zimbabwe?

15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Greenland

15,922 constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

16,897 constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Greenland rank

160th

Zimbabwe rank

159th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

Greenland
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 16,897 constant LCU per square kilometre against 15,922 constant LCU per square kilometre in Greenland, a difference of 975 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Greenland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Greenland ahead.

Greenland ranks 160th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 165 countries.

Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Greenland	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	10,560 constant LCU per square kilometre	6,239 constant LCU per square kilometre	4,321 constant LCU per square kilometre	Greenland
2010s	12,466 constant LCU per square kilometre	12,217 constant LCU per square kilometre	249.16 constant LCU per square kilometre	Greenland
2020s	15,949 constant LCU per square kilometre	13,623 constant LCU per square kilometre	2,325 constant LCU per square kilometre	Greenland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Greenland or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 16,897 constant LCU per square kilometre against 15,922 constant LCU per square kilometre in Greenland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Greenland and Zimbabwe?: 975 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Zimbabwe?: 15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Greenland and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?: Greenland ranks 160th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/greenland/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/greenland/zimbabwe/">Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit: constant LCU per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.