Greenland vs East Timor: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Greenland
15,922 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
22,782 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland rank
160th
East Timor rank
158th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Greenland
  • East Timor
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k200020112023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 22,782 constant LCU per square kilometre against 15,922 constant LCU per square kilometre in Greenland, a difference of 6,860 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.4 times Greenland's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was East Timor ahead.

Greenland ranks 160th and East Timor ranks 158th of 165 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greenland East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 8,174 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,038 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,864 constant LCU per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 12,466 constant LCU per square kilometre 39,817 constant LCU per square kilometre 27,350 constant LCU per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 15,949 constant LCU per square kilometre 24,063 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,114 constant LCU per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Greenland or East Timor?
East Timor, at 22,782 constant LCU per square kilometre against 15,922 constant LCU per square kilometre in Greenland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Greenland and East Timor?
6,860 constant LCU per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and East Timor?
21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do Greenland and East Timor rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Greenland ranks 160th and East Timor ranks 158th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs East Timor: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/greenland/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/greenland/timor-leste/">Greenland vs East Timor: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.