Ethiopia vs Romania: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Ethiopia
697,715 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
718,937 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ethiopia rank
103rd
Romania rank
100th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Romania
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199020062023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 718,937 constant LCU per square kilometre against 697,715 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ethiopia, a difference of 21,222 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Romania ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 103rd and Romania ranks 100th of 165 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Romania Difference Ahead
2010s 432,212 constant LCU per square kilometre 496,272 constant LCU per square kilometre 64,059 constant LCU per square kilometre Romania
2020s 643,703 constant LCU per square kilometre 637,479 constant LCU per square kilometre 6,224 constant LCU per square kilometre Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Ethiopia or Romania?
Romania, at 718,937 constant LCU per square kilometre against 697,715 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ethiopia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Ethiopia and Romania?
21,222 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Romania?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Ethiopia and Romania rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Ethiopia ranks 103rd and Romania ranks 100th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Romania: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ethiopia/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ethiopia/romania/">Ethiopia vs Romania: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.