Eswatini vs Palestine: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Eswatini
599,756 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine
650,208 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
106th
Palestine rank
105th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Palestine
200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k700.0k199420082023

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 650,208 constant LCU per square kilometre against 599,756 constant LCU per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 50,452 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 106th and Palestine ranks 105th of 165 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Palestine Difference Ahead
2010s 604,472 constant LCU per square kilometre 587,613 constant LCU per square kilometre 16,859 constant LCU per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 591,630 constant LCU per square kilometre 600,771 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,141 constant LCU per square kilometre Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Palestine?
Palestine, at 650,208 constant LCU per square kilometre against 599,756 constant LCU per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Palestine?
50,452 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Palestine?
11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Palestine rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 106th and Palestine ranks 105th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Palestine: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/west-bank-and-gaza/">Eswatini vs Palestine: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.