Eswatini vs United States: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Eswatini
599,756 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
United States
563,177 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
106th
United States rank
109th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • United States
0200.0k400.0k600.0k197019962023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 599,756 constant LCU per square kilometre against 563,177 constant LCU per square kilometre in United States, a difference of 36,579 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times United States's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 106th and United States ranks 109th of 165 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini United States Difference Ahead
2010s 604,472 constant LCU per square kilometre 453,940 constant LCU per square kilometre 150,531 constant LCU per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 591,630 constant LCU per square kilometre 535,614 constant LCU per square kilometre 56,015 constant LCU per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Eswatini or United States?
Eswatini, at 599,756 constant LCU per square kilometre against 563,177 constant LCU per square kilometre in United States as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Eswatini and United States?
36,579 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and United States?
11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and United States rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 106th and United States ranks 109th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs United States: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/united-states/">Eswatini vs United States: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.