How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and East Timor?

12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eritrea vs East Timor: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Eritrea

33,106 constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2011

East Timor

22,782 constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Eritrea rank

155th

East Timor rank

158th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

Eritrea
East Timor

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 33,106 constant LCU per square kilometre against 22,782 constant LCU per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 10,324 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.5 times East Timor's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was East Timor ahead.

Eritrea ranks 155th and East Timor ranks 158th of 165 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eritrea	East Timor	Difference	Ahead
2000s	13,529 constant LCU per square kilometre	13,839 constant LCU per square kilometre	309.1 constant LCU per square kilometre	East Timor
2010s	19,474 constant LCU per square kilometre	43,559 constant LCU per square kilometre	24,085 constant LCU per square kilometre	East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Eritrea or East Timor?: Eritrea, at 33,106 constant LCU per square kilometre against 22,782 constant LCU per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2011.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Eritrea and East Timor?: 10,324 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and East Timor?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
How do Eritrea and East Timor rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?: Eritrea ranks 155th and East Timor ranks 158th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs East Timor: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/timor-leste/">Eritrea vs East Timor: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit: constant LCU per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.