Eritrea vs Namibia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Eritrea
33,106 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2011
Namibia
53,208 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eritrea rank
155th
Namibia rank
153rd

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Eritrea
  • Namibia
020.0k40.0k60.0k198020012023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 53,208 constant LCU per square kilometre against 33,106 constant LCU per square kilometre in Eritrea, a difference of 20,102 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.6 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Namibia ahead.

Eritrea ranks 155th and Namibia ranks 153rd of 165 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 12,576 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,783 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,793 constant LCU per square kilometre Eritrea
2000s 13,529 constant LCU per square kilometre 20,353 constant LCU per square kilometre 6,824 constant LCU per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 19,474 constant LCU per square kilometre 32,381 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,907 constant LCU per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Eritrea or Namibia?
Namibia, at 53,208 constant LCU per square kilometre against 33,106 constant LCU per square kilometre in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Eritrea and Namibia?
20,102 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Namibia?
19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
How do Eritrea and Namibia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Eritrea ranks 155th and Namibia ranks 153rd of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Namibia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/namibia/">Eritrea vs Namibia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.