El Salvador vs New Zealand: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

El Salvador
302,722 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
325,671 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
120th
New Zealand rank
118th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • New Zealand
0100.0k200.0k300.0k197019962023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 325,671 constant LCU per square kilometre against 302,722 constant LCU per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 22,949 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was New Zealand ahead.

El Salvador ranks 120th and New Zealand ranks 118th of 165 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 138,721 constant LCU per square kilometre 102,409 constant LCU per square kilometre 36,312 constant LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 186,979 constant LCU per square kilometre 174,999 constant LCU per square kilometre 11,980 constant LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 186,356 constant LCU per square kilometre 240,657 constant LCU per square kilometre 54,301 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 260,308 constant LCU per square kilometre 316,056 constant LCU per square kilometre 55,748 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, El Salvador or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 325,671 constant LCU per square kilometre against 302,722 constant LCU per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between El Salvador and New Zealand?
22,949 constant LCU per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and New Zealand?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and New Zealand rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 120th and New Zealand ranks 118th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs New Zealand: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/new-zealand/">El Salvador vs New Zealand: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.