Croatia vs New Zealand: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Croatia
296,551 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
325,671 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Croatia rank
121st
New Zealand rank
118th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Croatia
  • New Zealand
0100.0k200.0k300.0k197019962023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 325,671 constant LCU per square kilometre against 296,551 constant LCU per square kilometre in Croatia, a difference of 29,120 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was New Zealand ahead.

Croatia ranks 121st and New Zealand ranks 118th of 165 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 109,932 constant LCU per square kilometre 119,158 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,226 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 191,705 constant LCU per square kilometre 174,999 constant LCU per square kilometre 16,706 constant LCU per square kilometre Croatia
2010s 183,003 constant LCU per square kilometre 240,657 constant LCU per square kilometre 57,654 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 241,235 constant LCU per square kilometre 316,056 constant LCU per square kilometre 74,821 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Croatia or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 325,671 constant LCU per square kilometre against 296,551 constant LCU per square kilometre in Croatia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Croatia and New Zealand?
29,120 constant LCU per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and New Zealand?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Croatia and New Zealand rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Croatia ranks 121st and New Zealand ranks 118th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs New Zealand: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/croatia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/croatia/new-zealand/">Croatia vs New Zealand: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.