Croatia vs El Salvador: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Croatia
296,551 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
302,722 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Croatia rank
121st
El Salvador rank
120th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Croatia
  • El Salvador
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k300.0k199020062023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 302,722 constant LCU per square kilometre against 296,551 constant LCU per square kilometre in Croatia, a difference of 6,171 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was El Salvador ahead.

Croatia ranks 121st and El Salvador ranks 120th of 165 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia El Salvador Difference Ahead
1990s 109,932 constant LCU per square kilometre 161,148 constant LCU per square kilometre 51,215 constant LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 191,705 constant LCU per square kilometre 186,979 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,726 constant LCU per square kilometre Croatia
2010s 183,003 constant LCU per square kilometre 186,356 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,353 constant LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 241,235 constant LCU per square kilometre 260,308 constant LCU per square kilometre 19,073 constant LCU per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Croatia or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 302,722 constant LCU per square kilometre against 296,551 constant LCU per square kilometre in Croatia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Croatia and El Salvador?
6,171 constant LCU per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and El Salvador?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Croatia and El Salvador rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Croatia ranks 121st and El Salvador ranks 120th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs El Salvador: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/croatia/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/croatia/el-salvador/">Croatia vs El Salvador: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.