Congo vs Sweden: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Congo
3.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
65th
Sweden rank
68th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Sweden
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 3.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 587,630 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 65th and Sweden ranks 68th of 165 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Sweden Difference Ahead
1980s 1.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre 250,996 constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
1990s 1.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre 270,995 constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
2000s 2.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre 744,043 constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
2010s 6.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
2020s 3.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre 160,535 constant LCU per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Congo or Sweden?
Congo, at 3.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Congo and Sweden?
587,630 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sweden?
39 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2023.
How do Congo and Sweden rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 65th and Sweden ranks 68th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Sweden: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/sweden/">Congo vs Sweden: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.