Chile vs Tanzania: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Chile
66.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
67.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
23rd
Tanzania rank
22nd
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time
- Chile
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 67.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 66.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 1.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 23rd and Tanzania ranks 22nd of 165 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 6.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 9.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre | Chile |
| 2000s | 31.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 12.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 19.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre | Chile |
| 2010s | 57.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 35.24 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 21.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre | Chile |
| 2020s | 62.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 61.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Chile or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 67.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 66.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Chile and Tanzania?
- 1.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tanzania?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Tanzania rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Chile ranks 23rd and Tanzania ranks 22nd of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.