Chad vs Malaysia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Chad
1.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
957,105 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
93rd
Malaysia rank
96th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Chad
  • Malaysia
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 1.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 957,105 constant LCU per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 226,345 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.2 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Malaysia ahead.

Chad ranks 93rd and Malaysia ranks 96th of 165 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 3 and Malaysia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Malaysia Difference Ahead
1990s 232,954 constant LCU per square kilometre 436,450 constant LCU per square kilometre 203,496 constant LCU per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 957,564 constant LCU per square kilometre 489,841 constant LCU per square kilometre 467,723 constant LCU per square kilometre Chad
2010s 1.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre 872,974 constant LCU per square kilometre 436,422 constant LCU per square kilometre Chad
2020s 1.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre 892,721 constant LCU per square kilometre 213,742 constant LCU per square kilometre Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Chad or Malaysia?
Chad, at 1.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 957,105 constant LCU per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Chad and Malaysia?
226,345 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Malaysia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Chad and Malaysia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Chad ranks 93rd and Malaysia ranks 96th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Malaysia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chad/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chad/malaysia/">Chad vs Malaysia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.