Cameroon vs Iceland: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Cameroon
10.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
8.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
48th
Iceland rank
49th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Cameroon
  • Iceland
2.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M197019962023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 10.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 8.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 1.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Iceland ahead.

Cameroon ranks 48th and Iceland ranks 49th of 165 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 3 and Iceland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 2.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre 388,006 constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 4.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre Cameroon
1990s 2.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre 392,689 constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 4.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 7.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre Cameroon
2020s 9.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Cameroon or Iceland?
Cameroon, at 10.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 8.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Cameroon and Iceland?
1.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Iceland?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Iceland rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Cameroon ranks 48th and Iceland ranks 49th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Iceland: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/iceland/">Cameroon vs Iceland: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.