Botswana vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Botswana
76,828 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
86,311 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
147th
Ecuador rank
144th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Ecuador
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 86,311 constant LCU per square kilometre against 76,828 constant LCU per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 9,483 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Ecuador ahead.

Botswana ranks 147th and Ecuador ranks 144th of 165 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Ecuador Difference Ahead
1970s 3,147 constant LCU per square kilometre 44,080 constant LCU per square kilometre 40,933 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 7,050 constant LCU per square kilometre 45,651 constant LCU per square kilometre 38,601 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 15,507 constant LCU per square kilometre 41,508 constant LCU per square kilometre 26,001 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 30,382 constant LCU per square kilometre 47,901 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,519 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 66,014 constant LCU per square kilometre 89,104 constant LCU per square kilometre 23,090 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 74,564 constant LCU per square kilometre 80,219 constant LCU per square kilometre 5,654 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Botswana or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 86,311 constant LCU per square kilometre against 76,828 constant LCU per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Botswana and Ecuador?
9,483 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ecuador?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Ecuador rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 147th and Ecuador ranks 144th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/ecuador/">Botswana vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.