Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Finland: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Bosnia and Herzegovina
190,486 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
184,115 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
129th
Finland rank
131st

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Finland
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k197019962023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 190,486 constant LCU per square kilometre against 184,115 constant LCU per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 6,371 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Finland ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 129th and Finland ranks 131st of 165 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Finland Difference Ahead
2000s 102,813 constant LCU per square kilometre 163,429 constant LCU per square kilometre 60,616 constant LCU per square kilometre Finland
2010s 132,729 constant LCU per square kilometre 177,338 constant LCU per square kilometre 44,609 constant LCU per square kilometre Finland
2020s 171,923 constant LCU per square kilometre 192,343 constant LCU per square kilometre 20,420 constant LCU per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Finland?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 190,486 constant LCU per square kilometre against 184,115 constant LCU per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Finland?
6,371 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Finland?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Finland rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 129th and Finland ranks 131st of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Finland: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/finland/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Finland: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.