Bolivia vs Canada: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Bolivia
56,694 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada
63,102 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia rank
151st
Canada rank
150th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Bolivia
  • Canada
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 63,102 constant LCU per square kilometre against 56,694 constant LCU per square kilometre in Bolivia, a difference of 6,408 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Bolivia ranks 151st and Canada ranks 150th of 165 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Canada Difference Ahead
1960s 6,938 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,610 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,671 constant LCU per square kilometre Canada
1970s 13,451 constant LCU per square kilometre 16,691 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,240 constant LCU per square kilometre Canada
1980s 10,304 constant LCU per square kilometre 23,801 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,497 constant LCU per square kilometre Canada
1990s 20,102 constant LCU per square kilometre 29,723 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,621 constant LCU per square kilometre Canada
2000s 25,011 constant LCU per square kilometre 46,303 constant LCU per square kilometre 21,292 constant LCU per square kilometre Canada
2010s 56,372 constant LCU per square kilometre 58,489 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,117 constant LCU per square kilometre Canada
2020s 52,215 constant LCU per square kilometre 62,000 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,785 constant LCU per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Bolivia or Canada?
Canada, at 63,102 constant LCU per square kilometre against 56,694 constant LCU per square kilometre in Bolivia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Bolivia and Canada?
6,408 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Canada?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Canada rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Bolivia ranks 151st and Canada ranks 150th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Canada: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/canada/">Bolivia vs Canada: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.