How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Lithuania?

29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Lithuania: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Belarus

217,493 constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Lithuania

225,375 constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Belarus rank

127th

Lithuania rank

126th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

Belarus
Lithuania

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 225,375 constant LCU per square kilometre against 217,493 constant LCU per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 7,882 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 127th and Lithuania ranks 126th of 165 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Lithuania	Difference	Ahead
1990s	61,436 constant LCU per square kilometre	51,171 constant LCU per square kilometre	10,265 constant LCU per square kilometre	Belarus
2000s	135,682 constant LCU per square kilometre	98,285 constant LCU per square kilometre	37,397 constant LCU per square kilometre	Belarus
2010s	273,283 constant LCU per square kilometre	128,524 constant LCU per square kilometre	144,759 constant LCU per square kilometre	Belarus
2020s	216,522 constant LCU per square kilometre	198,432 constant LCU per square kilometre	18,090 constant LCU per square kilometre	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Belarus or Lithuania?: Lithuania, at 225,375 constant LCU per square kilometre against 217,493 constant LCU per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Belarus and Lithuania?: 7,882 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Lithuania?: 29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Lithuania rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?: Belarus ranks 127th and Lithuania ranks 126th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Lithuania: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/lithuania/">Belarus vs Lithuania: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit: constant LCU per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.