Belarus vs Georgia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Belarus
217,493 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia
201,875 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
127th
Georgia rank
128th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Georgia
100.0k200.0k300.0k199220072023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 217,493 constant LCU per square kilometre against 201,875 constant LCU per square kilometre in Georgia, a difference of 15,618 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 127th and Georgia ranks 128th of 165 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Georgia Difference Ahead
2010s 273,283 constant LCU per square kilometre 139,678 constant LCU per square kilometre 133,605 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 216,522 constant LCU per square kilometre 162,231 constant LCU per square kilometre 54,290 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Belarus or Georgia?
Belarus, at 217,493 constant LCU per square kilometre against 201,875 constant LCU per square kilometre in Georgia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Belarus and Georgia?
15,618 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Georgia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Georgia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 127th and Georgia ranks 128th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Georgia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/georgia/">Belarus vs Georgia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.