Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Belarus
217,493 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina
190,486 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
127th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
129th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
100.0k200.0k300.0k199220072023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 217,493 constant LCU per square kilometre against 190,486 constant LCU per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 27,007 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Belarus ranks 127th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 129th of 165 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
2000s 135,682 constant LCU per square kilometre 102,813 constant LCU per square kilometre 32,869 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 273,283 constant LCU per square kilometre 132,729 constant LCU per square kilometre 140,554 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 216,522 constant LCU per square kilometre 171,923 constant LCU per square kilometre 44,599 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Belarus or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Belarus, at 217,493 constant LCU per square kilometre against 190,486 constant LCU per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
27,007 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 127th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 129th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.