Bangladesh vs Chile: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
80.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
66.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
20th
Chile rank
23rd

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Chile
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M196119922023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 80.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 66.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 13.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Chile ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 20th and Chile ranks 23rd of 165 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Chile Difference Ahead
1980s 4.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.62 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre Chile
1990s 8.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre 15.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre Chile
2000s 19.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre 31.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre 12.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre Chile
2010s 44.24 million constant LCU per square kilometre 57.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre 12.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre Chile
2020s 73.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre 62.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Chile?
Bangladesh, at 80.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 66.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Chile?
13.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Chile?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Chile rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 20th and Chile ranks 23rd of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Chile: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/chile/">Bangladesh vs Chile: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.