Bahamas vs Tonga: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Bahamas
308,102 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tonga
372,468 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
119th
Tonga rank
116th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • Tonga
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k198920062023

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 372,468 constant LCU per square kilometre against 308,102 constant LCU per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 64,366 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Tonga's figure about 1.2 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Tonga ahead.

Bahamas ranks 119th and Tonga ranks 116th of 165 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 2 and Tonga in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Tonga Difference Ahead
1990s 170,248 constant LCU per square kilometre 222,023 constant LCU per square kilometre 51,774 constant LCU per square kilometre Tonga
2000s 270,051 constant LCU per square kilometre 218,278 constant LCU per square kilometre 51,773 constant LCU per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 310,255 constant LCU per square kilometre 291,275 constant LCU per square kilometre 18,980 constant LCU per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 274,620 constant LCU per square kilometre 359,700 constant LCU per square kilometre 85,080 constant LCU per square kilometre Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Bahamas or Tonga?
Tonga, at 372,468 constant LCU per square kilometre against 308,102 constant LCU per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Bahamas and Tonga?
64,366 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Tonga?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Tonga rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 119th and Tonga ranks 116th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Tonga: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/tonga/">Bahamas vs Tonga: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.