Bahamas vs Croatia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Bahamas
308,102 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Croatia
296,551 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
119th
Croatia rank
121st

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • Croatia
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k198920062023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 308,102 constant LCU per square kilometre against 296,551 constant LCU per square kilometre in Croatia, a difference of 11,551 constant LCU per square kilometre.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Bahamas has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 119th and Croatia ranks 121st of 165 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Croatia Difference Ahead
1990s 182,324 constant LCU per square kilometre 109,932 constant LCU per square kilometre 72,391 constant LCU per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 270,051 constant LCU per square kilometre 191,705 constant LCU per square kilometre 78,346 constant LCU per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 310,255 constant LCU per square kilometre 183,003 constant LCU per square kilometre 127,252 constant LCU per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 274,620 constant LCU per square kilometre 241,235 constant LCU per square kilometre 33,386 constant LCU per square kilometre Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Bahamas or Croatia?
Bahamas, at 308,102 constant LCU per square kilometre against 296,551 constant LCU per square kilometre in Croatia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Bahamas and Croatia?
11,551 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Croatia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Croatia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 119th and Croatia ranks 121st of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Croatia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/croatia/">Bahamas vs Croatia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.