Australia vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Australia
80,767 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
86,311 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
145th
Ecuador rank
144th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Ecuador
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 86,311 constant LCU per square kilometre against 80,767 constant LCU per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 5,544 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Australia ranks 145th and Ecuador ranks 144th of 165 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 9,156 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,960 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,804 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 13,523 constant LCU per square kilometre 34,905 constant LCU per square kilometre 21,382 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 20,497 constant LCU per square kilometre 45,651 constant LCU per square kilometre 25,153 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 28,274 constant LCU per square kilometre 41,508 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,234 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 49,376 constant LCU per square kilometre 47,901 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,474 constant LCU per square kilometre Australia
2010s 71,521 constant LCU per square kilometre 89,104 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,583 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 76,024 constant LCU per square kilometre 80,219 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,195 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Australia or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 86,311 constant LCU per square kilometre against 80,767 constant LCU per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Australia and Ecuador?
5,544 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Ecuador rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 145th and Ecuador ranks 144th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/ecuador/">Australia vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.