Australia vs Cuba: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Australia
80,767 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba
76,782 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
145th
Cuba rank
148th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Cuba
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 80,767 constant LCU per square kilometre against 76,782 constant LCU per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 3,985 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.

Australia ranks 145th and Cuba ranks 148th of 165 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Cuba in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Cuba Difference Ahead
1970s 13,523 constant LCU per square kilometre 41,948 constant LCU per square kilometre 28,425 constant LCU per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 20,497 constant LCU per square kilometre 68,386 constant LCU per square kilometre 47,889 constant LCU per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 28,274 constant LCU per square kilometre 34,805 constant LCU per square kilometre 6,531 constant LCU per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 49,376 constant LCU per square kilometre 40,636 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,739 constant LCU per square kilometre Australia
2010s 71,521 constant LCU per square kilometre 67,908 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,612 constant LCU per square kilometre Australia
2020s 76,024 constant LCU per square kilometre 77,770 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,746 constant LCU per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Australia or Cuba?
Australia, at 80,767 constant LCU per square kilometre against 76,782 constant LCU per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Australia and Cuba?
3,985 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Cuba?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Australia and Cuba rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 145th and Cuba ranks 148th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Cuba: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/cuba/">Australia vs Cuba: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.