Papua New Guinea vs East Timor: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per capita
Papua New Guinea
270.62 constant LCU per person
in 2004
East Timor
342.76 constant LCU per person
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
165th
East Timor rank
164th
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per capita over time
- Papua New Guinea
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 342.76 constant LCU per person against 270.62 constant LCU per person in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 72.14 constant LCU per person.
That makes East Timor's figure about 1.3 times Papua New Guinea's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 165th and East Timor ranks 164th of 168 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per capita, Papua New Guinea or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 342.76 constant LCU per person against 270.62 constant LCU per person in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per capita between Papua New Guinea and East Timor?
- 72.14 constant LCU per person, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and East Timor?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2004.
- How do Papua New Guinea and East Timor rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per capita?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 165th and East Timor ranks 164th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.